I remember back in 2023, people were talking about this idea of creating an AI version of themselves and then charging per access to it. That sounded crazy to me.
Why would someone pay for access to an AI that's trained on your information when they could just use ChatGPT that's trained on all the information available online? But it turns out they were mostly right.
Not only are people going to pay for access to AI agents, they already are. It just doesn't look quite the way people imagined it would.
Take my agency, for example. The number one asset at our agency is the people, but the number two asset is definitely our cloud skills.
I never would have thought a set of marked down documents could be so valuable, but we've now put thousands of hours into developing and iterating on them. Now, all the services we provide for our clients still involve a human, but most of the work is don...