Source record
A few months ago, the digital marketing world was buzzing - and in some cases, panicking - over something called LLMs.txt...
A few months ago, the digital marketing world was buzzing and in some cases panicking over something called Llms. TXT. This is a plain text file that was supposed to tell large language models how to use a website's content.
But for anyone in traditional SEO, the idea didn't quite add up. After all, LLMs were already good at pulling from websites. Still, big headlines followed.
Venture capital firm Andreesen Horowitz published a widely shared piece how Generative Engine Optimization rewrites the rules of search. Now new research from Adobe is it's challenging the hype. Looking at server logs from over 1,000 websites, Adobe found no sign that major AI crawlers, not GPT bot, not Claude bot, not perplexity bot, were even checking the LLMS.
TXT file file. In fact, recent studies suggest ChatGPT often leans on Google results, not site specific instructions. Takeaway for now, the best way to get noticed by AI tools is still the compact keywords approach, the same tight purchase intent keywords strategy that works best for traditional SEO.
It seems the next big thing is still the old one.
Adobe research is cited as finding no signs that major AI crawlers checked `llms.txt` across 1,000+ websites, challenging GEO hype around the file.
Treat `llms.txt` as low-priority/experimental until evidence changes; focus first on crawlable useful content, SEO fundamentals, and cited source visibility.
This source is connected to llms.txt contradiction / AI crawlers.
A few months ago, the digital marketing world was buzzing and in some cases panicking over something called Llms. TXT. This is a plain text file that was supposed to tell large language models how to use a website's content. But for anyone in traditional SEO, the idea didn't quite add up. After all, LLMs were already good at pulling from websites...