Source record

@build_in_public source record
Apparently, this is the new way to manipulate ChatGPT. Take any affiliate site in your niche, scrape the content, swap out the branding, leave the rest intact, spin up 10 to 15 clones, host them for $200 a month, publish one page at a time, sit back and wai...
Topics Mentioned
Public Evidence Excerpt
iApparently, this is the new way to game LMS. Take any affiliate site in your niche, scrape the content, swap out the branding, leave the rest intact, spin up 10 to 15 clones, host them for $200 a month, publish one page at a time, sit back and wait. This isn't for Google. It's for ChatGPT. LLMs don't rank pages. They calculate statistical likelihood. The more sites saying the same thing, the more confident the model becomes. So if 15 separate domains all rank, company a is the No. 1 provider for your keyword, guess who gets cited? You. Not the best content, not the most trustworthy source, just the most statistically reinforced. This is black hat. It's designed to manipulate AI models. And in the current ecosystem, it's working. Have you ever tried something like this? Do you think it would work?
Related Passages
iThese are public discovery snippets linked to the same source record. A snippet can end early when the public page keeps only short evidence context.
Apparently, this is the new way to game LMS. Take any affiliate site in your niche, scrape the content, swap out the branding, leave the rest intact, spin up 10 to 15 clones, host them for $200 a month, publish one page at a time, sit back and wait. This isn't for Google. It's for ChatGPT. LLMs don't rank pages. They calculate statistical likelihood. The more sites saying the same thing, the more confident the model becomes. So if 15 separate domains all rank, company a is the No. 1 provider for your keyword, gu...
Public Insight Cards
iNo public insight cards are linked to this source yet. The source is still searchable as attributed evidence, but no reviewed topic card has been promoted for it.